Choose your location

Latest
Just in time for Halloween, Supermassive’s Directive 8020 gets online multiplayer Labor promises $30 weekly cap for Victorian public transport amid push for free travel Hundreds arrested in France as police clash with protesters Swinney's emotional explanation for his commitment to independence CJP volunteers stopped during Tiranga campaign near Charminar FDA uncovers expired food resale; FIR filed against Reliance, Blinkit executives

Ancient DNA discovery adjusts timeline of first North American humans: new study

See more of our coverage in your search results. Researchers examining ancient DNA have narrowed down the timeline of early human migration into North America — shedding light on a...

New York Post @nypost

See more of our coverage in your search results. Researchers examining ancient DNA have narrowed down the timeline of early human migration into North America — shedding light on a question that’s puzzled scientists for decades. The study, published online ahead of its appearance in the December 2026 issue of the journal Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, looked at previously published genetic and archaeological evidence to better understand when humans first arrived in the Americas.

Genetic evidence most strongly supports humans reaching the Americas between 14,000 and 20,000 years ago, the study suggests — with an arrival before 15,000 years ago considered likely. Previously, scientists thought the first humans arrived in North America roughly 13,500 years ago, a theory known as “Clovis First.” An illustration of Christopher Columbus arriving in the New World in 1492 in a collectible card published in 1887.

Getty Images Later archaeological discoveries have challenged that timeline, suggesting humans may have reached North America thousands of years earlier. The researchers, led by Bethany Potter and Savannah Hay of the University of Kansas, reviewed existing ancient DNA and archaeological evidence, including 23,000-year-old human footprints found at White Sands National Park in New Mexico.

The footprints suggest humans may have inhabited North America earlier than the timeline supported by currently available genetic evidence. A team of researchers examined ancient DNA and 23,000-year-old footprints to determine humans were in North America earlier than the suggested previous timeline.

Heritage Images/Getty Images Such early populations could have belonged to genetic lineages that have not yet been sampled or that left no surviving descendants, the researchers said. By comparing previously published genetic data from ancient human remains in Asia and the Americas, researchers examined shared ancestry to trace how early Indigenous populations split into distinct groups.

Some ancestral lineages diverged roughly 21,000 years ago, according to the review. The researchers also highlighted evidence that ancestral Native American populations split into northern and southern groups roughly 15,500 years ago, likely south of the massive ice sheets that once covered much of North America.

That would mean their ancestors had already reached the continent before the split occurred. “Genomic data show us that the dynamics of the peopling of the Americas were quite different — at one point, a small group of people must have entered the American continents completely devoid of other humans,” the researchers wrote.

Still, the researchers acknowledged that questions remain about exactly when and where early populations diverged. “The timing and geographic location of key divergence events mentioned above remain uncertain,” the authors wrote. Ancient DNA has also played a key role in other recent archaeological discoveries.

Earlier this summer, researchers announced the discovery of ancient sheep pox virus DNA in the York Gospels, a 1,000-year-old manuscript written in England. In Chile, researchers recently discovered ancient smallpox DNA in two centuries-old mummies, providing the first genetic evidence of the disease in that region of South America.

Article text via FreeNewsAPI. Rights remain with New York Post.

Read on publisher site → Opens New York Post in a new tab

More in Science