Number of the Day | 5 | 27 October 2026

South Africa's Investment Problem Is Bigger Than A Ranking Morocco's rise in an African investment index raises a difficult question: can South Africa turn its considerable economic advantages into the conditions businesses need to grow? South Africa has spent decades presenting itself as a natural entry point for investors seeking access to African markets.

It has sophisticated financial institutions, established industrial capacity and deep connections to international trade. Yet those advantages are becoming less decisive as other countries build the infrastructure, manufacturing industries and export networks needed to compete for investment.

The latest warning comes from Rand Merchant Bank's Where to Invest in Africa ranking, released on 27 October 2026. Morocco has overtaken South Africa to claim fourth place, pushing the continent's largest economy into fifth. Seychelles, Mauritius and Egypt retain the top three positions.

The ranking covers 31 African countries and considers 20 indicators spanning economic performance, investment conditions, market accessibility and human development. It is important to understand what the index measures. Fifth place does not mean South Africa receives the fifth-largest amount of foreign investment on the continent.

Rather, it reflects a comparative assessment of the conditions that make countries attractive to investors. That distinction matters because the ranking is less a verdict on investment already secured than a warning about future competitiveness. Manufacturing changes the competition Morocco's advantage has not emerged overnight.

RMB attributes its improvement to sustained industrialisation, export diversification, infrastructure investment and macroeconomic stability. Automotive manufacturing is a particularly important example: a country that builds a strong production base does more than attract a factory.

It creates opportunities for suppliers, logistics companies, technical workers and related industries. Those networks can become increasingly valuable over time. Once manufacturers have established supply arrangements, trained workers and reliable export routes, moving production elsewhere may be costly.

An investment destination can therefore develop advantages that are difficult for competitors to dislodge. South Africa understands this model. Major global automotive manufacturers already operate in the country, supported by an established industrial ecosystem.

But an existing manufacturing base does not guarantee future expansion. Investors considering where to place their next production line will also examine whether electricity is dependable, freight can move efficiently and public services can support operations. The growth figures illustrate the competitive pressure.

Morocco's economy expanded by 4.9% in 2025, compared with South Africa's 1.1%, according to the figures cited in the latest reporting. These percentages alone do not establish which economy offers the better investment opportunity: countries differ in size, structure and starting point.

They do, however, underline the challenge facing an economy seeking to generate jobs and expand its industrial capacity while growing slowly. The hidden cost of unreliable systems Investment competitiveness is often discussed in terms of tax incentives, labour costs and market size.

Yet the more immediate question for many businesses is whether they can operate predictably. A manufacturer needs electricity to run machinery, water for industrial processes and transport systems that deliver goods on schedule. Interruptions impose costs that can erode the advantages of an otherwise attractive location.

South Africa has made progress in addressing electricity constraints, but weaknesses in freight logistics and municipal services remain important concerns. These are not separate from industrial policy. A factory expansion, for example, depends on the performance of infrastructure and public institutions well beyond the factory gate.

Skills also form part of that equation. The ability to develop higher-value manufacturing and adapt to technological change depends on education, training and a workforce equipped for new production methods. Investment attraction is therefore connected to decisions made in classrooms, municipalities, transport networks and government departments.

A warning, not a verdict Nigeria offers another perspective. It climbed seven places to eleventh in the latest ranking, with RMB pointing to changes including fuel-subsidy removal, foreign-exchange reforms and statistical improvements. Its rise does not mean every reform has been painless or that its economic challenges have disappeared.

It does suggest that the investment landscape is responsive to changes in policy and economic conditions. South Africa's fall to fifth is not evidence that its industrial and financial strengths have vanished. The more consequential risk is that those strengths become less valuable if competing economies translate reforms and infrastructure spending into faster-growing productive industries.

The challenge is not simply to return to fourth place in a ranking. It is to build an economy in which companies can invest, manufacture, export and hire with greater confidence. If South Africa achieves that, a stronger ranking could follow.

If it does not, the country may discover that the most expensive part of losing ground is how difficult it becomes to recover. References · Rand Merchant Bank, Where to Invest in Africa; methodology and investment-attractiveness framework. · Bloomberg, “Morocco tops South Africa in RMB continental investment ranking”, 27 October 2026, also carried by Polity. · Number of the Day, 27 October 2026; Gareth Edwards and Francis Herd's discussion of manufacturing, infrastructure and investment competitiveness.

Catch up on all Number of the Day episodes here: ⁠ https://www.enca.com/number-day-podcast